This forum was organised in collaboration between IMU Clinical Campus Kluang, IMU Clinical Batu Pahat, Hospital Enche’ Besar Hajjah Khalsom, and Jabatan Alam Sekitar Malaysia Johor Bahru. The forum explored the intersections between medical ethics, environmental stewardship, and emerging technologies.
The event opened with an inspiring speech by Dr Sabariah binti Mohamad Sa’ad, Deputy Director of HEBHK, who emphasized the importance of bioethics in shaping responsible healthcare systems. Her address set the tone for a day marked by thoughtful analysis and lively debate
Debate 1: Government Action on AMR and Environmental Policy
The first debate session focused on the question:
“Should Governments Enforce Strict Environmental Policies to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) as a Public Health Imperative?”
Participants explored the global health threat posed by AMR, exacerbated by antibiotic misuse in medicine, agriculture, and industrial pollution. Representing the government side were Emily Tan, Irfan Mustaqim, and Kayshev Varman, who argued that environmental regulations are essential to combat AMR and safeguard public health. On the opposition, Mohammad Redzariel, Nurlisa Maisara, and Mohammad Aiman highlighted concerns over policy feasibility and unintended consequences.
Judged by Dr Htwe Htwe Sein, Dr Khine Khine Lwin, and Dr Wong Chuen Yin, the debate was marked by sharp rebuttals and evidence-backed arguments. The spirited exchange left attendees with a greater appreciation for the complexity of addressing AMR through policy.
Kayshev Varman from the government team stood out for his compelling arguments and delivery, earning him the Best Speaker Award for the session.
Between Sessions: An Insightful Presentation on Environmental Quality Act 1974
Between sessions, Encik Zuhairi bin Said from Jabatan Alam Sekitar Malaysia Johor Bahru delivered an insightful presentation on the Environmental Quality Act 1974. His talk underscored Malaysia’s legal tools for protecting environmental health, emphasizing enforcement challenges and opportunities for collaboration with the medical sector.
Debate 2: Integrating AI into Medical Decision-Making
The second debate session addressed a rapidly evolving issue:
“Should Governments Fully Integrate AI into Medical Decision-Making?”
On the government bench, Moamen Amin, Jaanush, and Jumana Shahid advocated for leveraging AI to enhance healthcare access, accuracy, and cost-efficiency. The opposition team—Nur Hidayah, Akash, and Leong Whay Shern —voiced ethical concerns regarding autonomy, bias, and data privacy.
Judges Dr Chew Lay Boon, Dr Harith, and Dr Mohamed Abd Elwahab were impressed by the clarity and passion shown by both sides. The debate illuminated the need for careful regulatory oversight as AI technologies become integral to medical practice.
Leong Whay Shern received the Best Speaker Award for his persuasive arguments and impactful presence during the session.
Conclusion
The forum concluded with a prize-giving ceremony and closing remarks by Dr Htwe Htwe Sein, the programme chairperson. She praised the participants for their intellectual engagement and the organising committee for executing a seamless and meaningful event.
Dr Htwe expressed her gratitude to the judges, guest speaker, student volunteers, and staff of HEBHK. Special thanks were given to Muhammad Nabil, the student coordinator, and the team of emcees, secretaries, and photographers whose behind-the-scenes efforts made the event a resounding success.
With topics rooted in urgent global challenges and emerging innovations, the 2025 Bioethics Forum exemplified the critical thinking and collaboration needed in future healthcare leaders. As debates on AMR and AI continue in real-world policymaking, IMU students remain at the forefront of ethical dialogue.
Thoughts Shared